Skip to content
§RECORD · REGULATORY CAPABILITYDOC-01 · v1
Compliance at the core

Regulatory compliance as a first-class capability.

Brazilian tax obligations inside the same system where your operation lives — NF-e already prepared for the Tax Reform, national NFS-e and eSocial, with NFC-e, CT-e and SPED in validation. Architecture designed for other countries.

PORTFOLIO IN HOMOLOGATION
IN HOMOLOGATION
Brazil
  • 01TAX & FISCAL5
  • 02LABOR1
  • 03SECTOR-SPECIFIC2
TOTAL IN HOMOLOGATION8

All operate with an institution-specific digital certificate, with cryptographic protection for private keys.

§01 · WHY NATIVE

Fiscal compliance as part of the core — not a wrapped module.

In conventional ERP, fiscal compliance lives in a separate module, often developed by a third party, with its own update cycle and integration points that fail exactly when regulations change. Operational audit lives in one system, fiscal audit in another — and they never reconcile.

Aether treats compliance as part of the core. Each regulatory obligation is a plugin developed in the same versioning system, with the same level of governance and the same audit standard as the rest of the platform. In homologation today, this capability is proven in Brazil — the architecture was designed to extend with the same rigor to other jurisdictions.

CONVENTIONAL APPROACH

Integration in separate layers

  • 01External vendor with its own regulatory update cycle.
  • 02Operational and fiscal audit live in different systems — reconciliation is manual work.
  • 03Fragile integration points between billing, inventory, and fiscal.

AETHER APPROACH

Integration as the same platform

  • 01Regulatory updates enter the same versioning system as the rest of the platform.
  • 02Compliance audit crosses the same timeline as the operational audit.
  • 03Billing, inventory, and fiscal do not integrate — they are the same system.

The practical result is that when the tax authority publishes a change, the update does not depend on coordination with an external vendor. And when the auditor requests cross-tracing, the answer is a query — not a project.

§02 · PORTFOLIO IN HOMOLOGATION

Eight regulatory obligations operating today.

Each plugin operates with active integration to the corresponding federal, state, or municipal authorities. Closed list of what is in homologation — no projected items.

  • CL. 01

    NF-e

    Electronic Fiscal Invoice

    Fiscal document for product transactions between companies, with direct transmission to state authorities.

    SCOPE

    Interstate

    DOMAIN

    Billing

  • CL. 02

    NFC-e

    Consumer Electronic Fiscal Invoice

    Fiscal document for point of sale, with contingency support when transmission is unavailable.

    SCOPE

    State

    DOMAIN

    Point of sale

  • CL. 03

    CT-e

    Electronic Transport Document

    Fiscal document for logistics operations, covering the main transport modes.

    SCOPE

    Interstate

    DOMAIN

    Logistics

  • CL. 04

    NFS-e

    Electronic Service Invoice

    Service fiscal document via the National System, with municipal integration.

    SCOPE

    Municipal

    DOMAIN

    Service

  • CL. 05

    SPED

    Digital Fiscal Bookkeeping

    EFD ICMS/IPI and EFD Contributions. Generation, validation, and verification of bookkeeping records.

    SCOPE

    Federal

    DOMAIN

    Bookkeeping

  • CL. 06

    eSocial

    Labor and Payroll Events

    Unified labor and social security obligation, covering periodic and non-periodic events.

    SCOPE

    Federal

    DOMAIN

    Labor

  • CL. 07

    Educacenso

    School Census

    Education sector obligation with integration to the authority responsible for the annual collection.

    SCOPE

    Sector-specific

    DOMAIN

    Education

  • CL. 08

    Agro-RX

    Agronomic Prescription

    Electronic agronomic prescription per Law 14.785/2023, with traceability and verification.

    SCOPE

    Sector-specific

    DOMAIN

    Agribusiness

OPERATIONAL NOTE

Each plugin operates with an institution-specific digital certificate, with cryptographic protection for private keys. Rotation and expiration monitored by the platform, with advance alerts before expiry.

§03 · THE ARCHITECTURE BEHIND

Four pillars under the same governance anchor.

The platform treats compliance as a controlled extension. Each plugin operates within the same audit, permission, and isolation umbrella as the rest of the system.

GOVERNANCE ANCHOR

Each plugin automatically inherits the same data isolation, permissions and audit as the rest of the platform.

01ISOLATION

Isolated schema per plugin

Each obligation operates in its own data scope. An update to NF-e does not touch SPED. A migration in CT-e does not affect eSocial.

02AUDIT

Governance applied automatically

Each institution-scoped table within the plugins inherits the same isolation policies as the rest of the platform — nothing falls outside the audit umbrella.

03OPERATION

Explicit lifecycle

A plugin can be installed, activated, deactivated, and uninstalled with transactional integrity — without leaving orphaned state in the database or the interface.

04INTEGRATION

Obligation-specific APIs

Each plugin exposes its public interface; the platform consolidates audit, permissions, and reports — external integration speaks to a single layer.

§04 · JURISDICTIONS

What is in homologation, what the architecture enables, and what is outside the public roadmap.

Transparency about coverage: distinguishing operational capability from architectural extensibility is part of the contract with whoever reads this page.

IN HOMOLOGATION01 / 03

Brazil — federal, state, and municipal

Eight active plugins operating with real integration to the corresponding federal, state, and municipal authorities. Cross-audit, institution-specific digital certificate, updates tracking official publications.

  • Federal obligations: SPED, eSocial, Educacenso, Agro-RX.
  • Interstate and state obligations: NF-e, NFC-e, CT-e.
  • Municipal obligations: NFS-e via National System.
ARCHITECTURE READY02 / 03

Jurisdiction-agnostic plugin engine

The architecture was designed with the concept of a plugin associated with a country from the start. Adding compliance for another market is a natural extension — not a platform refactor.

  • Jurisdiction isolation in the same model used today in Brazil.
  • Automatic governance replicable without altering the core.
  • Decoupled external integration — one layer per authority.
OUTSIDE THE PUBLIC ROADMAP03 / 03

International planning, case by case

Operationally, no international plugin implementation is in homologation today. Any expansion horizon is handled with a specific strategic partner — not as a published schedule with dates.

  • No country listed as coming soon on this page.
  • No quarter or year for a future jurisdiction.
  • International conversations happen under NDA, through direct contact.
EDITORIAL RULE

Extensible architecture is not a promise of implementation. No plugin is mentioned as coming soon without having effectively entered homologation.

§05 · WHAT THE CFO WANTS TO KNOW

Four questions that come first in the fiscal analysis.

Direct answers, no hedging. If the answer depends on context, it says so.

  • 01pergunta

    When SEFAZ publishes a technical note, what is the update timeline?

    The cycle depends on the criticality of the note and the scope of the change. The architecture supports updates without downtime for the entire platform — the affected plugin updates in isolation, without forcing the rest of the operation to stop.

  • 02pergunta

    If a digital certificate expires, what happens?

    The platform monitors certificate validity per institution and alerts before expiration. The operator rotates without losing fiscal history — the signed trail remains intact and auditable.

  • 03pergunta

    Can I audit fiscal operations individually?

    Yes. Each issuance leaves a trace on the same immutable timeline that the operational audit uses. Who issued, when, and what the payload was is a query through the interface — not a ticket to the DBA.

  • 04pergunta

    How does SEFAZ invoice rejection work?

    The plugin records the rejection, explains the reason, preserves the operation state, and signals through Nous if the rejection has a recurring pattern suggesting a root cause — for the operator to fix before the next cycle.

NOTE

None of the answers above substitutes the taxpayer's legal responsibility for the fiscal operation. The platform's scope is technical: execution, tracking, audit, and integration with the authorities.

§06 · SECTOR OBLIGATIONS

Beyond general fiscal obligations, plugins for sector-specific requirements.

When the client operates in a vertical with an obligation not covered today, the plugin architecture allows dedicated development — often as part of a partnership program with a vertical software house in that domain.

EDUCATIONANEXO · 01

Educacenso

Federal school census. Annual collection of data on schools, enrollments, classes, and education professionals, with integration to the responsible authority.

AGRIBUSINESSANEXO · 02

Agro-RX

Electronic agronomic prescription per Law 14.785/2023. Digital prescription, traceability, and QR Code verification.

VERTICAL EXTENSIBILITY

Additional sectors enter as dedicated extensions

If your vertical has an obligation not listed here, the plugin architecture allows specific development with the same governance and audit standard. This work typically happens in partnership with a software house that specializes in the vertical.

§07 · NEXT STEP

Mapping compliance to your operation is a 45-minute conversation.

Three questions guide the diagnosis. The conversation is with someone from Aether's technical team and your fiscal lead.

  1. 01

    Which obligations does your company issue today — and with which tool?

  2. 02

    Which integration points between fiscal and operational fail in your routine?

  3. 03

    Is there a sector-specific obligation that requires particular handling?